Article Sidebar
Views PDF: 239
Phẫu thuật bóc lớp trong động mạch cảnh kinh nghiệm 500 trường hợp
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Carotid endarterectomy is effective method for preventing stroke due to carotid stenosis. Carotid endarterectomy has been performed in Viet nam since 2002.
The purpose of this study was review our experience on carotid endarterectomy in Ho Chi Minh city.
Methods: Prospective. Eveluate the clinical characteristics of stenosis of the carotid. Diagnosis was based on Duplex scanning, CT Angiography (CTA) and/or angiography. Carotid endarterectomy were performed for all of cases with conventional carotid endarterectomy or Eversion carotid endarterectomy.
Primary outcomes are mortality rates, stroke rates, restenosis at 1 month, 1 year and 5 years after operation.
Result: From 2004 to 2014, 500 carotid endarterectomy were done in Thong nhat hospital, Univerrsity Medical Hospital at HCMC and FV hospital. Mean age is 70.2 range 46 – 92, male : female ratio is 4:1. 54,8% of cases had stroke before, 12,4% of cases had bilateral carotid stenosis. Atherosclerosis are the cause of all cases. All of patients were diagnosed by Duplex scan and CTA. No procedure-related morbidity or mortality was observed. 03 (0,6%) patients died by AMI, and pneumonia in 1 month postoperative period, 04 (0,8%) stroke in 1 month after operation. After 1-10 years follow up, 5 years mortality rates is 2,0%, stroke rates is 1,4%, restenosis is 1,8%. 2 patients died after 2 years and 5 years due to cancer, 2 had stroke, 6 recurrent stenosis.
Conclusions: Carotid endarterectomy is the safeand effective methods for preventing stroke due to stenosis of carotid artery.
Article Details
Keywords
Hẹp động mạch cảnh, đột quỵ não, phẫu thuật bóc lớp trong động mạch cảnh.*
References
2. Đỗ Kim Quế. (2004). Chẩn đoán và điều trị ngoại khoa hẹp động mạch cảnh ngoại sọ. Y học thực hành. 491: 405 – 409. PHẪU THUẬT TIM MẠCH VÀ LỒNG NGỰC VIỆT NAM SỐ 12 - THÁNG 2/2016 36
3. Đỗ Kim Quế. (2008). Phẫu thuật bóc lớp trong động mạch cảnh 2 bên. Y học Việt Nam, 2(352): 262-74.
4. Đỗ Kim Quế. (2011). Kết quả ngắn và trung hạn phẫu thuật bóc lớp trong động mạch cảnh. Tạp chí Y học Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh. 15(1): 434 – 439.
5. Đỗ Kim Quế (2011). Phẫu thuật Bóc lớp trong động mạch cảnh: kinh nghiệm 5 năm. Tạp chí Y học Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh. 15(2): 248 – 252.
6. Đỗ Kim Quế, Chung Giang Đông. (2012). Điều trị ngoại khoa hẹp động mạch cảnh ngoài sọ: kinh nghiệm 200 trường hợp. Tạp chí Y học Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh. 16(4): 256 – 261.
7. Lê Nữ Hòa Hiệp, Nguyễn Thế Hiệp. (2003) Điều trị ngoại khoa hẹp động mạch cảnh ngoài sọ nhân ba trường hợp tại bệnh viện nhân dân Gia định. Y học TP. Hồ Chí Minh. 7 (phụ bản 2):92- 96. Tiếng Anh
8. AbuRahma AF, Robinson PA, Mullin DA, Holt SM, Herzotg TA, Mowery NT. (2000) Frequency of postoperative cartid duplex serveillance and type of closure: Results from randomized trial. Vasc Surg. 32:1043-51.
9. Back MR, Wilson JS, Rushing G, Stordahl N, Linden C, et al. (2000) Magnetic resonance angiography is an accurate imaging adjunct to Duplex ultrasound in patient selection for carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 32:429-41.
10. Ballotta E, Meneghetti G, Mananra R. (2007). Long-term survival and stroke-free survival after eversion carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic severe carotid stenosis. J Vasc Surg. 33: 678-83
11. Ballotta R, Luzzani L, Carugatti C. (2006). Routine shunting is a safe and reliable method of cerebral protection during carotid endarterectomy. Ann Vasc Surg, 12: 243 - 46
12. Bertoletti G, Varroni A, Misuraca M, Massucci M, Pacelli A, et al. (2013) Carotid Artery Diameters, Carotid Endarterectomy Techniques and Restenosis. J Vasc Med Surg 1: 114
13. Bluth EI, Sunshine JH, Lyons JB, et al. (2000) Power Doppler imaging: initial evaluation as a screening examination for carotid artery stenosis. Radiology. 215:791– 800.
14. Bonati LH, Jongen LM, Haller S, et al. (2010). New ischemic brain lesions on MRI after stenting or endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: a substudy of the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS). Lancet Neurol. 9:353– 62.
15. Broderick J, Brott T, Kothari R, et al. (1998). The Greater Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Stroke Study: preliminary first-ever and total incidence rates of stroke among blacks. Stroke. 29:415–21.
16. Brott TG, Hobson RW, Howard G, et al. (2010). Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med. 363:11–23.
17. Cinà CS, Clase CM, Haynes BR. (1999). Refining the indications for carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis: A systemic review. J Vasc Surg 30:606-18.
18. Corriveau MM, Johnston KW. (2004). Interobsever variability of carotid Doppler peak velocity measurements among technologists in an ICVLaccredited vascular laboratory. Vasc Surg. 39:735-41.
19. Demirel S, Attigah N, Bruijnen H, Ringleb P, Eckstein H, Fraedrich G, Bo¨ckler D (2012). Multicenter Experience on Eversion versus Conventional Carotid Endarterectomy in
Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis. Stroke 43:1865-1871.
20. Eckstein HH, Ringleb P, Allenberg JR, et al. (2008). Results of the Stent-Protected Angioplasty versus Carotid Endarterectomy (SPACE) study totreat symptomatic stenoses at 2 years: a multinational, prospective, randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 7:893–902.
21. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. (1995). Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.JAMA.273:1421– 8.
22. Filis KA, Arko FR, Johnson BL, Pipinos II, Harris EJ, Oncott C, Zarins CK. (2002). Duplex ultrasound criteria for defining the severity of carotid stenosis. Ann Vasc Surg 416: 213-221.
23. Fine-Edelstein JS, Wolf PA, O’Leary DH, et al. (1994). Precursors of extracranial carotid atherosclerosis in the Framingham Study. Neurology. 44:1046 –50.