Article Sidebar
Views PDF: 287
Evaluation of early results of patients with permanent peacemakers implantation at Bai Chay Hospital from 2016 to 2020
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objectives: Review the results of pacing and some early complications of patients Who implanted pacemaker at Bai Chay Hospital from 2016 to 2020. Subjects and research methods: A descriptively prospective study longitudinal follow-up study on 31 bradyarrhythmia patients who were permanently paced at Bai Chay Hospital from 2016 to October 2020. Results: After implantation of pacemaker, the rate of symptoms improved markedly, the change was statistically significant with p = 0.0001. Medium heart rate before and after implantation (47.84 ± 7.712 with 65.61 ± 4.425, 95%CI: 17.77 ± 7.173, p = 0.000). Change in QRS width after implantation (153.52 ± 11,963ms vs 91.81 ± 10,882ms, 95%CI 61.71 ± 12,947, p = 0.000). Pacing threshold changed after 6 months (0.68 ± 0.146V; 0.73 ± 0.149; p=0.001). Received R wave and electrode wire impedance did not changing after 6 months of follow-up. The rate of complications right after the procedure accounted for a total of 6.45%. The rate of complications after 6 months of follow-up accounted for 6.45%. Complications were all minor complications and were well managed. The successful rate of the procedure reached 100%, the pacing parameter was assessed as good, accounting for 70.97%. Conclusion: The method is considered effectively in the symptom improvement, safety, low complication rate and should be applied and deployed for patients with bradyarrhythmias with indications for permanent pacemaker implantation.
Article Details
Keywords
early results, permanent peacemaker implantation
References
2. Tạ Tiến Phước et al (2015). Research on techniques and hemodynamic effects of pacemaker implantation. Master’s Thesis in Cardiology, 103 Military Medical Academy.
3. Tohru Kawakami, Nobukiyo Tanaka, Hiroyoshi Ohno et al (2012). The relationship between right Ventricular lead position and paced QRS duration. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiol, 36(2), 187–193.
4. Parikshit S. Sharma, Gopi Dandamudi, Angela Naperkowski, et al (2015). Permanent His-bundle pacing is feasible, safe, and superior to right ventricular pacing in routine clinical practice. Heart Rhythm, 12(2), 305–312.
5. Phạm Như Hùng, Phạm Hồng Quân (2017). Research on pacing parameters at the interventricular septum and at the right ventricular apex. Master's Thesis in Cardiology - Hanoi Medical University.
6. Đỗ Doãn Lợi, Trương Thanh Hương (2012). Myocardial dyssynchrony and assessment methods - topic 2: Research on left ventricular asynchrony by Doppler echocardiography of myocardial tissue in hypertensive patients with normal left ventricular function. Military Medical academy
7. Ziqing Yu, Ruizhen Chen, Yangang Su et al (2017). Integrative and quantitive evaluation of the efficacy of his bundle related pacing in comparison with conventional right ventricular pacing: a meta-analysis. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 17(221).
8. Parikshit S. Sharma, Gopi Dandamudi, Bengt Herweg et al (2017). Nghiên cứu hiệu quả lâm sàng, cận lâm sàng trên những bệnh nhân sau đặt máy tạo nhịp vĩnh viễn. Heart Rhythm, 15(3), 413–420.
9. Mads Brix Kronborg, Peter Thomas Mortensen, Jens Christian Gerdes et al (2011). His and para-His pacing in AV block: feasibility and electrocardiographic findings. J Interv Card Electrophysiol, 31, 255–262.
10. Reye Carrión-Camacho, Ignacio Marín-León, José Manuel Molina-Doñoro et al (2019). Safety of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation: A Prospective Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 8(35), 1–11.