Early results of aortic root enlargement using y-incision technique (yang technique) in Hanoi Heart Hospital

Minh Ngoc Nguyen1, , Sinh Hien Nguyen1, Thai Minh Nguyen1, Quang Thien Le1, Thanh Hung Ngo1, Vu Dang Minh Pham2
1 Hanoi Heart Hospital
2 Hanoi Medical University

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: Aortic root enlargement during aortic valve replacement (AVR) prevented patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) in patients with a small aortic annulus. The Y-incision technique, described by Yang B., was a simple and effective method that allowed valve upsizing by 2-3 sizes, reduced operative time, and minimized complications.


Methods: An incision was made from the left-noncoronary sinus junction, extended in a Y-shape below the annulus and above the left atrial roof, exposing the aorto-mitral curtain. The annulus was enlarged using a rectangular patch, with the prosthetic valve partially sutured to the patch. Data from patients were retrospectively analyzed and evaluated clinical characteristics and postoperative outcomes.


Results: 27 patients underwent AVR with Yang’s aortic root enlargement at Hanoi Heart Hospital. Procedures included open single-valve surgery, minimally invasive single-valve surgery, double-valve surgery, and valve re-replacement. Valve upsizing by 2 sizes was achieved in 77.8% of patients, and by 3 sizes in 14.8%. Postoperatively, two patients required reoperation for bleeding, none required permanent pacemaker implantation, and there were no early mortalities. The mean postoperative gradient was low (average 12.6 mmHg, maximum 22.7 mmHg).


Conclusion: Yang technique was simple and effective, achieving at least 2-size valve upsizing, reducing operative time, and minimizing complications by avoiding damage to other cardiac structures. Postoperative transvalvular gradients were low, with no cases of PPM.

Article Details

References

1. Kulik A, Al-Saigh M, Chan V, et al. Enlargement of the small aortic root during aortic valve replacement: is there a benefit? Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85(1):94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.07.058
2. Yang B. A novel simple technique to enlarge the aortic annulus by two valve sizes. JTCVS Tech. 2021; 5:13-16. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2020.10.038
3. Makkinejad A, Hua J, Hassler KR, et al. Comparison of the short-term outcomes between Y-incision aortic annular enlargement and traditional aortic annular enlargement techniques. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2024;13(3):255-265. doi:10.21037/acs-2023-aae-0102
4. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Prosthesis-patient mismatch: definition, clinical impact, and prevention. Heart. 2006;92(8):1022-1029. doi:10.1136/hrt.2005.067363
5. Yang B. Aortic annular enlargement with Y-incision/rectangular patch. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2024;13(3):294-302. doi:10.21037/acs-2023-aae-0151
6. Yang B, Ghita C, Makkinejad A, Green C, Wu X. Early outcomes of the Y-incision technique to enlarge the aortic annulus 3 to 4 valve sizes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024;167(4):1196-1205.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.07.006
7. Yang B, Monaghan K, Hassler K, Brescia A, Yazdchi F. Updates on Y-incision aortic annular enlargement. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2024;13(3):308-310. doi:10.21037/acs-2023-aae-0140
8. Massias SA, Pittams A, Mohamed M, Ahmed S, Younas H, Harky A. Aortic root enlargement: When and how. J Card Surg. 2021;36(1):229-235. doi:10.1111/jocs.15175
9. Hiền N. S., Thiện L. Q. Mở rộng gốc động mạch chủ trong phẫu thuật thay van động mạch chủ tại Bệnh viện Tim Hà Nội. YDLS 108. 2020; 13, 109-115.