Preliminary evaluation of the role of transit-time flow measurement in coronary artery bypass grafting at Thong Nhat Hospital
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains a cornerstone treatment for multivessel coronary artery disease. Transit-time flow measurement (TTFM) has been recognized as a reliable intraoperative tool for real-time assessment of graft quality. However, data on its prognostic value remain limited in Vietnam. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 42 patients who underwent isolated CABG at Thong Nhat Hospital between January 2023 and September 2025. Intraoperative graft flow was assessed using TTFM, and postoperative outcomes were compared between patients with a pulsatility index (PI) ≤ 3 and those with PI > 3.
Results: The mean age was 62.5 ± 8.6 years, and 85.7% were male. The left internal mammary artery and saphenous vein graft were most frequently used, in 95.2% and 76.2% of cases, respectively. Overall in-hospital mortality was 2.4%. The most common postoperative complications were pneumonia (14.3%) and heart failure (26.2%). Compared with PI ≤ 3, patients with PI > 3 had significantly longer postoperative stays (3.6 ± 1.7 vs. 2.2 ± 0.9 days; p = 0.017). Other adverse events, including heart failure (38.5% vs. 20.7%) and in-hospital mortality (7.7% vs. 0%), were more frequent in the PI > 3 group but did not reach statistical significance. No significant differences were observed in the rates of reoperation, wound infection, acute kidney injury, or stroke.
Conclusions: Intraoperative graft flow assessment with TTFM during CABG was associated with improved postoperative outcomes. A PI > 3 was linked to prolonged postoperative recovery and may reflect compromised graft quality, although it did not independently predict major adverse events.
Keywords
Coronary artery bypass grafting, transit-time flow measurement, pulsatility index
Article Details
References
[2]. Tan PH, Azmi MI, Zulkifli Z, Amin MA, Hassan SNS, Zulkifli MFE, Hashim SA. Transit time flow measurement and outcome in coronary artery bypass grafting for surgeon and trainee. J Thorac Dis. 2022;14(1):36-42. doi: 10.21037/jtd-21-1550. PMID: 35242366; PMCID: PMC8828516.
[3]. Kieser TM, Taggart DP. The use of intraoperative graft assessment in guiding graft revision. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;7:652-62. 10.21037/acs.2018.07.06
[4]. Thuijs DJFM, Bekker MWA, Taggart DP, et al. Improving coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the impact of adopting transit-time flow measurement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;56:654-63.
[5]. Jokinen JJ, Werkkala K, Vainikka T, et al. Clinical value of intra-operative transit-time flow measurement for coronary artery bypass grafting: a prospective angiography-controlled study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;39:918-23.
[6]. Oshima H, Tokuda Y, Araki Y, et al. Predictors of early graft failure after coronary artery bypass grafting for chronic total occlusion. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016;23:142-9.
[7]. Di Giammarco G, Pano M, Cirmeni S, et al. Predictive value of intraoperative transit-time flow measurement for short-term graft patency in coronary surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;132:468-74.
[8]. Raphael C, et al. Limitations of the New York Heart Association functional classification system and self-reported walking distances in chronic heart failure. Heart. 2007;93(4):476-82.
[9]. Campeau L. Letter: Grading of angina pectoris. Circulation. 1976;54(3):522-3. PMID: 947585.
[10]. Drost S, Drost CJ: Flow-based CABG patency evaluation: physical and statistical background. Transonic White Paper DRI(CV-30-wp) [internet] 2022 [cited 2022 Oct 27]; Available from: https: //www.transonic.com/white-paper-DRI(CV-30-wp).
[11]. Becit N, Erkut B, Ceviz M, et al: The impact of intraoperative transit time flow measurement on the results of on-pump coronary surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007; 32: 313–318
[12]. Takahashi K, Morota T, Ishii Y: A novel transit-time flow metric, diastolic resistance index, detects subcritical anastomotic stenosis in coronary artery bypass grafting. JTCVS Tech 2023; 17: 94–103