Article Sidebar
Views PDF: 309
Evaluate health-related quality of life of patients following minimally invasive open-heart surgery with endoscopoic support for mitral valve replacement at the cardiovascular centre of E hospital
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients following minimally invasive open-heart surgery with endoscopic support for mitral valve replacement at the Cardiovascular Center of E Hospital.[1]
Subjects and methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study on 46 cases following minimally invasive open-heart surgery with endoscopic support for mitral valve replacement at Cardiovascular Center of Hospital E from 1/1/2021 to 31 /21/2021, using the SF-36 questionnaire.
Results: The mean score of 4 physical health domains including phýical functioning, functional limitations, bodily pain and general health were: 77,12; 70,38; 68,21, and 52.57. The average scores of the four mental health domains including including vitality, social functioning, role emotional and general mental health are: 79.24; 68.21; 88.7 and 75, respectively. Factors related to HRQOL of patients following minimally invasive open-heart surgery with endoscopically assisted mitral valve replacement are age, occupation, and economic status of the patient.
Conclusion: The total points of HRQOL in all areas were quite and quite good. Therefore, minimally invasive open-heart surgery with endoscopic support for mitral valve replacement is an indication for clear improvement in postoperative patients.
Article Details
Keywords
Quality of life, SF-36, minimally invasive open-heart surgery with endoscopic support for mitral valve replacement
References
2. Litynski G.S. (1999). Endoscopic surgery: the history, the pioneers. World J Surg, 23(8), 745–753.
3. Bush B., Nifong L.W., and Chitwood W.R. (2013). Robotics in cardiac surgery: past, present, and future. Rambam Maimonides Med J, 4(3), e0017.
4. Sepehripour A.H., Garas G., Athanasiou T., et al. (2018). Robotics in cardiac surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 100(Suppl 7), 22–33.
5. Doulamis I.P., Spartalis E., Machairas N., et al. (2019). The role of robotics in cardiac surgery: a systematic review. J Robot Surg, 13(1), 41–52.
6. Thành L.N., Hựu N.C., Nguyên P.T., et al. (2014). Phẫu thuật tim hở ít xâm lấn với nội soi hỗ trợ tại Trung tâm tim mạch Bệnh viện E: Những kinh nghiệm ban đầu qua 63 bệnh nhân phẫu thuật. VJCTS, 7, 24–28.
7. Brenneman F.D., Wright J.G., Kennedy E.D., et al. (1999). Outcomes research in surgery. World J Surg, 23(12), 1220–1223.
8. Suri R.M., Antiel R.M., Burkhart H.M., et al. (2012). Quality of life after early mitral valve repair using conventional and robotic approaches. Ann Thorac Surg, 93(3), 761–769.
9. Burns D.J.P., Rapetto F., Angelini G.D., et al. (2021). Body mass index and early outcomes following mitral valve surgery for degenerative disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 161(5), 1765-1773.e2.
10. Huang L.-C., Chen D.-Z., Chen L.-W., et al. (2020). Health-related quality of life following minimally invasive totally endoscopic mitral valve surgery. J Cardiothorac Surg, 15(1), 194.
11. Goldsmith I.R., Lip G.Y., and Patel R.L. (2001). A prospective study of changes in the quality of life of patients following mitral valve repair and replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 20(5), 949–955.
12. B.A (1997). Measuring Health: A Review of Quality of Life Measurement Scales. (Open University Press).
13. Cleland J.G.F., Cohen-Solal A., Aguilar J.C., et al. (2002). Management of heart failure in primary care (the IMPROVEMENT of Heart Failure Programme): an international survey. Lancet, 360 (9346), 1631–1639.