Outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation using evolut self-expanding valves at Cardiovascular Center – E Hospital
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the procedural outcomes, safety, and clinical efficacy of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) using the Evolut self-expanding valve system in patients with severe aortic stenosis at E Hospital.
Methods: A descriptive, longitudinal study was conducted on 21 patients undergoing TAVI from December 2019 to December 2025.
Results: The mean age was 72.2 ± 8.3 years; males accounted for 52.4%. Complex characteristics included bicuspid aortic valves (33.3%), degenerated bioprosthetic valves (Valve-in-Valve) (19.0%), and concomitant coronary artery disease requiring Chimney stenting (23.8%). The mean EuroSCORE II was 5.2 ± 1.8%, and the STS Score was 4.1 ± 1.5%. Regarding hemodynamics, the effective orifice area (EOA) increased from 0.65 ± 0.15 cm² to 1.85 ± 0.45 cm²; the mean pressure gradient decreased from 55 ± 12 mmHg to 8.5 ± 3.2 mmHg. The procedural volume increased over time, peaking with 9 cases in 2025. In-hospital mortality was 9.5% (2 cases); both occurred in the early phase (2020 and 2023) associated with highly complex anatomy. Moderate paravalvular leak was observed in 1 case (4.8%), and there were no cases of conduction disorders requiring a permanent pacemaker (0%). No major complications were recorded in the 2024–2025 period. At the 6-month follow-up, left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) improved from 57.38 ± 12.1% to 60.15 ± 9.8%.
Conclusion: TAVI using Evolut self-expanding valves is a feasible and effective procedure at E Hospital. Despite initial challenges related to the learning curve, the current protocol has been standardized with high safety outcomes. The role of the Heart Team in patient selection and thorough anatomical assessment is the key factor in improving treatment outcomes.
Keywords
TAVI, Evolut, Aortic Stenosis, E Hospital
Article Details
References
2. Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, et al. 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77(4):e25-e197.
3. Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack MJ, et al. Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(17):1609-1620.
4. Popma JJ, Deeb GM, Yakubov SJ, et al. Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Self-Expanding Valve in Low-Risk Patients. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(18):1706-1715.
5. Vo TN, Nguyen VH, Nguyen NL, et al. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Vietnam: The First 5-Year Experience. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2019;73(9 Supplement 1):123.
6. Reardon MJ, Van Mieghem NM, Popma JJ, et al. Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(14):1321-1331.
7. Mylotte D, Lefèvre T, Søndergaard L, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid aortic valve disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(22):2302-2313.
8. Yudi MB, Sharma SK, Tang GHL, et al. Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(12):1360-1378.
9. Cagliani A, Giordano A, Modelttieri A, et al. Subclavian access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2020;21(10):777-784.
10. Phạm Mạnh Hùng, Nguyễn Ngọc Quang, et al. Đánh giá kết quả trung hạn thay van động mạch chủ qua đường ống thông tại Viện Tim mạch Việt Nam. Tạp chí Tim mạch học Việt Nam. 2018;85:34-42.
Similar Articles
- Dac Dai Tran, Thi Huong Nguyen, Quang Huy Bui, Thi Hoai Thu Doan, Thi Tham Dang, Quang Long Pham, Thi Kim Oanh Tran, Thi Hoa Phan, Thi Yen Nguyen, Short – term outcomes of percutaneous ballon pulmonary valvuloplasty for isolated valvular pulmonary stenosis in pediatric patients: experience from the Cardiovascular Center – E Hospital , The Vietnam Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery: Vol. 57
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.