Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 28/08/2023
Online Published: 04/09/2023
Abstract Views: 225
Views PDF: 113
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47972/vjcts.v43i.1024
Issue
Vol. 43: SỐ ĐẶC BIỆT CỦA HỘI TIM MẠCH THÀNH PHỐ HÀ NỘI
Section
Research Article
How to Cite
Phan, T. M., Nguyen, D. C., & Pham, N. H. (2023). The quality of life of patients after percutaneous coronary intervention and some factors affecting. The Vietnam Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, 43, 157 - 166. https://doi.org/10.47972/vjcts.v43i.1024

The quality of life of patients after percutaneous coronary intervention and some factors affecting

Thi May Phan1, , Duy Chinh Nguyen1, Nhu Hung Pham1
1 Hanoi Heart Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: Determining some factors affecting the quality of life patient’s after percutaneous coronary intervention used the HeartQoL scale at Hanoi Heart Hospital.


Methods & Results: According to the formula for calculating sample size for a given ratio, we conducted a study on 150 patients after percutaneous coronary intervention at Hanoi Heart Hospital from June 2020 to the end of February 2021. We used the Heart QoL questionnaire to assess the quality of life of patients before and after coronary intervention at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months. The mean age in the study was 63,7 ± 10,3 years (66,7% male) had measured by HeartQoL score. There was a difference in the quality of life score of patients after percutaneous coronary intervention compared with before intervention (2,1 ± 0,4 to 2,5 ± 0,3; p< 0,001). Quality of life scores in the physical area improved significantly after the intervention from 1,9 ± 0,4 before PCI to 2,4 ± 0,4 after PCI (p < 0,05). The factors of age, gender, education level, income level, health status, chest pain status, NYHA level related to the quality of life patient’s after PCI (p < 0,05). 


Conclusion: The patient's quality of life improved after 6 months of intervention. The characteristics of age, gender, education level, income level, chest pain status after PCI, NYHA level and health status were related to the quality of life patient’s after PCI.

Article Details

Keywords

HeartQol, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Coronary artery disease

References

1. Oldridge N, Höfer S, McGee H, Conroy R, Doyle F, Saner H. The HeartQoL: Part II. Validation of a new core health-related quality of life questionnaire for patients with ischemic heart disease. European journal of preventive cardiology. 07/20 2012;21doi:10.1177/2047487312450545
2. Oldridge N, Hofer S, McGee H, Conroy R, Doyle F, Saner H. The HeartQoL: Part I. Development of a new core health-related quality of life questionnaire for patients with ischemic heart disease. European journal of preventive cardiology. Jan 2014;21(1):90-7. doi:10.1177/2047487312450544
3. De Smedt D, Clays E, Höfer S, et al. Validity and reliability of the HeartQoL questionnaire in a large sample of stable coronary patients: The EUROASPIRE IV Study of the European Society of Cardiology. European journal of preventive cardiology. 2020;23(7):714-721. doi:10.1177/2047487315604837 %J European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
4. Van Nguyen H, Khuong LQ, Nguyen AT, et al. Changes in, and predictors of, quality of life among patients with unstable angina after percutaneous coronary intervention. J Eval Clin Pract. 2020/06// 2020;doi:10.1111/jep.13416
5. Darvishpour A, Javadi-Pashaki N, Salari A, Sadeghi T, Taleshan-Nejad M. Factors associated with quality of life in patients undergoing coronary angioplasty. International journal of health sciences. Sep-Oct 2017;11(4):35-41.
6. Leung Yinko SS, Pelletier R, Behlouli H, Norris CM, Humphries KH, Pilote L. Health-related quality of life in premature acute coronary syndrome: does patient sex or gender really matter? Journal of the American Heart Association. Jul 28 2014;3(4)doi:10.1161/jaha.114.000901
7. Jankowska-Polańska B, Uchmanowicz I, Dudek K, Łoboz-Grudzień K. Sex differences in the quality of life of patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with percutaneous coronary intervention after a 3-year follow-up. Patient preference and adherence. 2016;10:1279-87. doi:10.2147/ppa.S106577
8. Xiao L, Wang P, Fang Q, Zhao Q. Health-promoting Lifestyle in Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. kcj. 03 2018;48(6):507-515. doi:10.4070/kcj.2017.0312
9. Yazdani-Bakhsh R, Javanbakht M, Sadeghi M, Mashayekhi A, Ghaderi H, Rabiei K. Comparison of health-related quality of life after percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass surgery. ARYA atherosclerosis. May 2016;12(3):124-131.
10. Alsén P, Brink E, Persson L-O, Brändström Y, Karlson BW. Illness Perceptions After Myocardial Infarction: Relations to Fatigue, Emotional Distress, and Health-Related Quality of Life. 2010;25(2):E1-E10. doi:10.1097/JCN.0b013e3181c6dcfd
11. Qintar M, Grantham JA, Sapontis J, et al. Dyspnea Among Patients With Chronic Total Occlusions Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Prevalence and Predictors of Improvement. Circulation Cardiovascular quality and outcomes. Dec 2017;10(12)doi:10.1161/circoutcomes.117.003665
12. Holubkov R, Laskey WK, Haviland A, et al. Angina 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention: A report from the NHLBI Dynamic Registry. American Heart Journal. 2002/11/01/ 2002;144(5):826-833. doi: https://doi.org/10.1067/mhj.2002.125505